Legal Question in Intellectual Property in California

Is it legal for a corporation to oppose a U.S. individual's trademark application for a particular word mark but allow for a different corporation to subsequently register the exact same word mark unopposed? Basically, is it okay for a corporation to say you cannot have this trademark, but turn a blind eye with respect to opposition proceedings before the TTAB when another corporation applies for the exact same mark a few years later? Are there any statutes of limitations that would apply and if so when will they start... When I found out this event occurred? Or when the subsequent corporation successfully registered the mark unopposed?


Asked on 10/20/12, 4:25 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Nancy Delain Delain Law Office, PLLC

Trademarks come in classes. There's a clothing class, a food class, a legal services class, a sports class, a cars class, and about 5,000 other classes that describe the particular stream of commerce that the trademark is found in. If the trademark you're talking about is registered in one class and an individual tries to register the mark in that class -- say, clothing -- then the owner can oppose the registration. If the trademark is registered in one class -- say, clothing -- and someone tries to register the mark in a different class -- say, cars -- that registration is less likely to provoke an opposition from the senior user.

That's true for normal trademarks. When a mark rises to the level of being famous (and the senior user must prove fame as a question of fact in TTAB or court proceedings), then the protection across classes expands and gets looped in with the idea of trademark dilution. The owner of a famous mark can protect that famous mark across classes.

Statutes of limitations exist, but they are too complex to go into in this forum. If you're actually involved in this scenario as either the senior or junior user of the mark, you need to consult a trademark attorney pronto.

THIS POST CONTAINS GENERAL INFORMATION AND IS INTENDED FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE, NOR DOES IT CREATE ANY ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON YOUR PARTICULAR MATTER, CONSULT YOUR ATTORNEY.

Read more
Answered on 10/20/12, 6:16 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Intellectual Property questions and answers in California