Legal Question in Intellectual Property in California
Please read this scenario which is followed by a question:
A client has a website designed for them. They don't pay the web designer and "steal" the website by logging into the server and downloading the files, then uploads them to the client's server*. The client knows that they owe money and that taking it is wrong, it is clear that the client is expected to pay before taking the intellectual property. The web designer submits a DMCA to the webhost who takes down the site. The client counters and gets the site back up.
The client just stated under perjury on the DMCA that this take down was by mistake or misidentification. From the scenario we can see the DMCA was submitted due to theft and real copyright infringement and not due to mistake or misidentification.
My question is, can the client be convicted of perjury if it can be proved that it was known that he didn't own copyright or even a release to use the images? If so, how would charges be filed? Would I have to take him to court for copyright infringement or can I report this to the police or some agency?
*Note:I have also tried reporting the unlawful access to a stored communication to the FBI and local police and they won't help me so that is a lost cause.
1 Answer from Attorneys
I assume you are the Web designer here. First, please note that you have mentioned three or more possible court-related approaches to getting paid or otherwise punishing the erstwhile client. These include a criminal prosecution, which would have to originate with the district attorney prosecuting in the name of the People of the State of California; a copyright suit which would presumably need to be brought in a U.S. District Court; and at least indirectly you suggest or propose a more conventional suit for breach of contract and other damages, perhaps for fraud.
You have already taken the first steps toward initiating a criminal case, and the cops have discouraged you.......not surprising at all, considering the financial plight of county governments in California and the cutbacks in the D.A.'s offices, where some counties are no longer even able to prosecute simple misdemeanors. If it looks like it might be "a civil matter," the authorities aren't interested.
As for the copyright-infringement case, this might be a theoretical possibility, but unless you have a reason for wanting the case in Federal court, it's probably a more expensive route and a far less direct theory upon which to get a judgment.
You didn't say how much the client owes you. If you'd be satisfied with $7,500 or less, I would advise taking the matter to Small Claims Court - fast and quite inexpensive. Get and study a book on California Small Claims procedures. If your claim is for over roughly $15,000, you might consider a suit in Superior Court for plain-vanilla breach of contract. I hope you have a signed written agreement and documentation as to your time spent.
Related Questions & Answers
-
I have a idea for a website where I would like all members to execute a... Asked 3/15/11, 12:11 pm in United States California Intellectual Property