Legal Question in Intellectual Property in California

rights of buyer and seller on a bill of sale

On a bill of sale stating that the buyer has paid $7,000.00 63.5% of 11,000.00 total, toward a used car for a down payment. With monthly payments of $500.00 until the car is payed for in full the seller will tranfer the title to the buyer upon recieving the total amount. With Vin# and Licence#, date and signature of both parties and both parties have their own copy. On a contract such as this....

would the seller still have the right to take the car back without refunding the money back to the seller before the tranfer of title is made? Would the seller have the right to report the car stolen, before the transfer of title is made? Would the seller have to refund every cent back to the buyer before reclaiming the vehicle?


Asked on 5/12/06, 4:40 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: rights of buyer and seller on a bill of sale

First, your question is in the wrong category. You will get more answers if you re-ask it as a business law or contract law question. The intellectual property category covers things such as patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Anyway, here's an attempt at an answer.

First, non-payment of a contract obligation such as a car purchase loan is not a crime, and the buyer does not commit theft by failure to pay, without some additional facts such as an attempt to deprive the seller of the property, perhaps coupled with his disappearance.

Second, the right to repossess an auto for non-payment of the financing arises out of the seller having retained a security interest in the auto. In professionally-prepared sale papers, the seller or other party providing financing will take a security interest in the car. If the papers are prepared by non-lawyers, it is very possible that there may be no security interest and the unpaid balance will be an unsecured loan and there is no right to repossess.

When there is a default on a contract, there are two common results. One is that the contract is rescinded. When that happens, the parties are put back into prior status, before the contract, except for actual damages. You would get the car back, and the buyer would get his money back except for your actual damages (which could be pretty substantial).

The other common outcome is the contract stays in place, and the seller gets damages representing his expectation as if the contract were fully performed. The buyer gets the car, you get the full price, plus maybe some interest, costs of suit, and, if the contract had an attorney fee clause, you'd get that too.

Read more
Answered on 5/12/06, 4:59 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Intellectual Property questions and answers in California