Legal Question in Employment Law in California
Mandatory Lunch Break
I understand that California law requires employers to provide a lunch break. But I have been told that it is also law that an employee ''must'' take a lunch break under California law and can not work 8 hours straight.
I have searched through the California Labor Code and can not find any specific code that states an employee ''must'' take a lunch break.
If you agree that it is law that an employee ''must'' take a lunch break, please do not just agree with this thread. I am looking for legal documentation to support this. (IE. a specific Labor Code Number, etc.)
Thanks.
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Mandatory Lunch Break
Yes, you are required to take your meal period, or the employer must pay you for the extra time. Those are currently the only two options.
For further information, I recommend you visit the Division of Labor Standard Enforcement's website, at www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/dlse.html. Look in the Frequently Asked Questions section for additional information and sources to answer your questions regarding meal periods.
Re: Mandatory Lunch Break
I can see how this could be confusing. There is no statute that says you are "required" to take a lunch break. What the labor code says, is that if you work more than six hours, your employer is required to give you a thirty minute break where you are relieved of all duties. If you do not take this break, your employer is liable to you for penalties. The reason your employer is requiring you to take this break is they do not want to have to pay these penalties or be liable to you if you should decide to sue them later on. Hopefully this answers your question.