Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in California
I tried to file a request for trial postponement in small claims court in California (I am the defendant). Because of a misunderstanding on my part it was not filed and returned to me because I did not include $10 filing fee. I received that notification on Thursday July 26, and the trial is Monday July 30th, therefore no time to postpone it, and, I currently live out of the country (in Puerto Rico). I spoke to clerks at the court house and was told about filing a 'motion to vacate' after judge's decision. Also spoke to small claims adviser and was told it was worth resubmitting it even though there was no time to postpone. I hired a courier and they did the filing for me on Friday the 27th. I explained that I had tried to file before, and that the reason I could not be there on trial date is because I live out of the country, have a son whom is a minor solely under my care that will begin school next week, I have no one to care for him, and also the travel expenses I would have to incur. I did this in the hope that the judge will have this information at trial and at least see the reasons why I am not there, and that I did try to postpone and do things right. I should mention that I am the Landlord, I do own a property in California, and when I was served (3 weeks prior to trial date), I was in CA just visiting for a few days. What is your opinion on this? Would my attempt to reach the court may be of any benefit to me? Thank you very much.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Obviously the trial has already occurred. Since you were served the court does have jurisdiction over you and will render a judgment, which you can appeal and have an attorney representing you on the appeal, if it is worth the legal expenses. I do not see what legal basis you have to file a motion to vacate, especially since the same factors preventing you from being present 7/30 will apply to later dates.