Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in California
Hi,
I have a eviction case. I am living in a single family house but with 4 illegally converted units.
a new landlord was trying to evict all 4 tenants by filing a unlawful detainer case against a named tenant(the only named one defendant) and "Does 1-10".
I had a lease with privious owner and no relation to the named defendant.
I filed Prejudgement claim of right to possesion with an answer. and in a trial a judge striked my answer saying I had jumped into this case as a 3rd party unnamed.
both parties represented themselves wit out attorneys. in next hearing in 2 weeks, a judge advised that platiff can default me and I may request reinstate my answer through appellate division. now I know I should have filed amended answer right after first trial but I did not know that.
platiff requested defaults but after being rejected due to the original answer(on their computer system-in summary- stricken answer was shown but only in the file) he filed again, and I filed another a answer after his first default request.
what is my option?
can I file a motion to remove me from this case as a answering defendant?
or just wait until default entered and file a motion to apell ate division.
Thank for any help.
1 Answer from Attorneys
The judge was wrong in striking your answer since you live in the subject unit, had a lease agreement and filed a prejudgment right of possession.
Get a lawyer promptly. If you cannot afford one there are free or low cost lawyers you can find, such as eviction defense network. You will need to file a motion for reconsideration to show this judge why striking your answer was incorrect. You may also need to file a Writ, either a Writ of Mandate or Prohibition and request the case be stayed while the higher court is reviewing your Writ.
Good luck.
Related Questions & Answers
-
My landlord withholding my belonging Asked 5/14/17, 8:02 pm in United States California Landlord & Tenants