Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in California
I am currently renting two rooms in a house with the landlord. When we moved in we signed a 1 year lease. That was in September of 09. After a year he asked if we wanted to renew and we said yes,but we never signed an extension of the lease. I also work for the landlord and he said that any wages I earn would be deducted from the rent and that at the end of each month we would settle if there was a shortage or overage. I have earned enough each month,except1, and had a surplus that paid the difference. During this time the landlord has loaned or paid some of our bills,car repair, tires, ect. he has always said that would be seperate from the rent each month and that we would pay that off with the excess earnings after each month. He now has given us a thirty day notice to vacate the premises and that he is terminating the lease because of non-payment of over due balances.he gave us a notice dated the 2nd of December and delivered to us on the 12th of December stating things he wanted to address regarding rules in the house,when to be in kitchen,when to do laundry, ect... At no time did he demand the past money owed. he did ask when we could pay and i said we would have to pay it off monthly and that i was trying to get a second job because his business was not doing well at the time. Yesterday we went through all the earnings I had since last June and calculated how much i earned and then subtracted how much the rent was each month.I had enough earnings to cover the rent up and until this month,but not all the bills, march. This morning he issued a 30 day notice and demand to vacate the premises. What are my options
1 Answer from Attorneys
First, a 30 day notice to terminate is not the correct notice. A 30 day notice may only be used to terminate your tenancy where you have lived in the property for less-than one year. As I read your email, you have lived there for over one year, and therefore he must give you a sixty day notice to terminate your tenancy. That, however, assumes that you do not have a term lease, but rather have a month-to-month tenancy.
When the lease term expired in September 2010, you either became a month-to-month tenant, or you extended the term of the lease for another year. Because you did not sign a new lease or an extension of the written lease, it is going to be difficult for you to prove that you did agree to a new one-year renewal term. It's subject to a "he said, she said" argument in court, and a judge will have to decide who he believes. Because written leases are generally extended with another written agreement, the burden may be difficult to overcome to prove that you did intend for the lease to be renewed for another full year. If you can prove the lease term is good through September 2011, then he cannot even give you a sixty day notice, but rather must evict you for some other breach of the lease such as not paying rent.
With respect to the issue of rent for wages, that is generally not legal. The Employment Development Department will have a lot to say about this issue, but as soon as you turn them on to deal with this, you will not want to be living in the same house with your employer. I would suggest moving out, then contacting EDD to file a wage complaint for unpaid past wages. Finally, with respect to the other bills paid, unless that was part of the original lease agreement, then it is an entirely separate debt you will have to resolve with him. Good luck - I would strongly suggest that the best thing you can do is find a new place to live and move on.
*Due to the limitations of the LawGuru Forums, The Gibbs Law Firm, APC's (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided is general and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence. As required by 11 U.S.C. �528, we must now disclose that, "We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code. Assistance we provide with respect to Debt Relief may involve bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code."