Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

I was on Active duty with the Navy, Chase bank held our mortgage. Chase sold our mortgage to a company called EMC . During conversations with Chase we were told if there was missed payments during the time I was deployed overseas they would revise loan to extend the term, and put missed payments at end of loan term. After EMC got our mortgage they said we don't do that,

as a result we were forced to try to do a loan modification with the new company. (EMC) To make matters worse we were informed after the fact, that once again our mortgage was sold again to a company called Marix LLC. My question is: Did Chase have the right to sell our mortgage during my deployment overseas. #2 Was EMC permitted to sell our loan to Marix without notifying us.


Asked on 5/09/11, 6:32 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

There is a law called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, or SCRA. It is the successor to the Soldiers and Sailors Relief Act of 1940. Any provisions of law extending special protection to men and women on active duty would be in that law.

You will find many references to the SCRA on Google and via other search engines, or ask your CO. Here is one useful link: http://www.military.com/benefits/legal-matters/scra/overview

I'm not an expert on what's in and what isn't in the SCRA. I'm pretty sure it contains substantial protection against foreclosures. I'm much less certain that it places any restrictions on financial firms' buying and selling mortgages. This is very commonplace; few mortgages (i.e., notes secured by deeds of trust) end up being owned by the lender that originated them.

Another caution for you is that the SCRA may not provide as much protection for mortgages taken out before you became active-duty military as it does for those loans made after you became active-duty.

Read more
Answered on 5/09/11, 7:27 pm
George Shers Law Offices of Georges H. Shers

What ever protections are in the laws Mr. Whipple refers to, the general rule is that someone buying a contract is bound by all the terms of the contract. So what ever Chase agreed to is also binding on EMC, etc.The subsequent mortgage note holders will probably say that Chase's additional agreement was not in writing and so they had no notice of it and you have to fight that out with Chase, but you should argue that is an issue they must resolve with Chase as you did not know the note would be sold and they bought it at their own peril.

Read more
Answered on 5/09/11, 8:08 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California