Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Agreed Boundary Doctrine

My house built in 1867 and my neighbors home built in the 1930's share a common fence and very old trees. The newer (1930's) home has discovered through a new survey that the fence is approx. 3' on his side and wants to remove and replace the existing fence and cut down any trees encroaching. After measuring this dispute, only one tree splits that new line. the huge trunk is 50/50 on sides, the rest are still on my side of the new line. I don't want him to cut anything down! This fence and trees have been as they are for possible 70+ years. WHat can I do? Obviously at some point the property owners agreed on this boundry line and erected this fence, even though the TRUE line could be incorrect. Please help- he plans to fire up the chainsaw in a few days!


Asked on 7/15/09, 11:32 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Scott Linden Scott H. Linden, Esq.

Re: Agreed Boundary Doctrine

You may have an easement across his property because of the length of time that the fence has been there (has it been there for over 20 years?)

You also may want to contact the local Grass Valley city council and try to have the trees named as historic landmarks (as well as your home), but be advised that if they do so, repairs, etc., will have to be made with authentic time-period parts or receive city approval to use newer identical parts.

If you would like to discuss this matter further in a more private forum, please feel free to contact me directly at the email address provided by LawGuru or through our firm�s website located at PasadenaEstatePlanning.com

IMPORTANT:

No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. You may not rely in any way on this communication, and nothing herein constitutes legal advice nor legal opinion. Your issue may be time-sensitive and may result in a loss of rights if you do not obtain an attorney immediately.

Read more
Answered on 7/15/09, 3:37 pm
Cathy Cowin Law Offices of Cathy Cowin

Re: Agreed Boundary Doctrine

I would not assume that the prior owners ever agreed upon a property line. I am hesitant to get into an extended analysis on the facts presented in this forum. What will probably be a real bottom line, unfortunately, is money. You can go into court for an emergency temporary injunction to keep the tree from being cut down. That would only be the beginning of a legal bill as these neighbor disputes can get ugly. Since neighbor disputes always involve relationship issues as well as the "thing" you're in disagreement over, if there is a chance of participating in mediation it would be a good direction. There are numerous places you can get free mediation, often with a mediator with significant legal knowledge. The difficulty is in getting everyone to agree to the process. Sometimes a temporary restraining order pushes it that direction and sometimes it just creates really bad feelings and entrenched positions. If you're going to approach this from the direction of the courts, I would be prepared to realized that the tree probably involves a large invoice. (Sorry for the tough love there.) I would see if your neighbor would agree to settling this matter through alternative dispute resolution methods.

Read more
Answered on 7/15/09, 3:40 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California