Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
Our California HOA Board approved the January Minutes 23 February 2013. The 1st set of minutes was signed by the Secretary on 1 April. The 2nd set of minutes was signed by the Secretary on 6 February--17 days before approval. The 1st set had 6 pages and the 2nd set had 7 pages. Does this constitute tampering in California? Does Davis-Stirling CA Corps Code 8215 apply?
This Board has a history of bias when reporting minutes.
1 Answer from Attorneys
You're mixing up a lot of legal issues. Corporations Code section 8215 governs California corporations and corporate meetings, and has nothing to do with the Davis-Stirling Act, which is set forth in the Civil Code, not the Corporations Code. Bias means an inclination towards one point of view, without a view towards something else. Tampering means something has been altered. None of your mixed up legal issues make any sense.