Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
does construction work performed without permits required by local law constitute a nuisnace per se?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Civil Code section 3479 defines a nuisance as: �Anything which is injurious to health, including, but not limited to, the illegal sale of controlled substances, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property ....� �A nuisance may be a public nuisance, a private nuisance, or both.� (Newhall Land & Farming Co. v. Superior Court (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 334, 341.) �A public nuisance is one which affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal.� (Civ. Code, � 3480.)
�[A] nuisance per se arises when a legislative body with appropriate jurisdiction, in the exercise of the police power, expressly declares a particular object or substance, activity, or circumstance, to be a nuisance . . . . [T]o rephrase the rule, to be considered a nuisance per se the object, substance, activity or circumstance at issue must be expressly declared to be a nuisance by its very existence by some applicable law.� (Beck Development Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1160, 1206-1207.)