Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
Is a contract established if the deposit is not deposited?
Landlord gave prospective tenants (Tenant A and Tenant B, a couple) verbal ''okay'' after checking references. Then tenant A's mother (unsolicited) gave a bad reference about tenant B. Landlord told Tenant A they would not rent out property and are returning deposit check. Tenant A agreed.
Now Tenant A and Tenant B are threatening Landlord with legal action if they do not get to rent property.
Do they have any grounds?
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Is a contract established if the deposit is not deposited?
Possibly. If an agreement has been made, and the landlord accepted a check, then a contract may have been formed.
Re: Is a contract established if the deposit is not deposited?
It depends on whether they agreed on all of the essential terms of the lease. Even if there was a contract, what are the damages? Presumably the landlord could give a 30 day notice to vacate even before the tenants move in. What have the tenants lost by being deprived of the opportunity to rent for a month or less? Certainly the landlord's decision is not discriminatory, because it is based on information from a source (A's mother) who is in a position to know.
Re: Is a contract established if the deposit is not deposited?
I think it is a major obstacle that "Tenant A agreed" to the return of the deposit. Even if a lease contract were formed, which is doubtful at best, the agreement of the landlord and one of the prospective tenants to a return of the deposit would amount to a rescission of the contract with full restitution accomplished. Further, Tenant A would be regarded as the agent of Tenant B for all necessary purposes.