Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Contractor's liability

Hello, I loaned construction funds to a contractor to rehab a spec house and carried back a trust deed. He did not complete the job and stopped paying on the note he owed to me. I forclosed on the property, finished the work and sold the house at a loss. Is this a situation that allows me to file a claim against his contractor's bond even though it is not my primary dwelling and I do not have a contract to perform the work?


Asked on 11/11/08, 6:41 pm

4 Answers from Attorneys

Re: Contractor's liability

You would not be able to recover the loss on the sale of the property, but I would argue you could recover the cost to finish the contractor's work.

Consult with an attorney to find our for sure.

Read more
Answered on 11/12/08, 10:41 am
Erik Nowacki Business Law Inc.

Re: Contractor's liability

First of all, if the contractor owned the house at the time of the rehab (which I assumed he did since he was able to give you a deed of trust), you would have a difficult time to go after the contractor's bond. Essentially, he was acting as an owner/builder at that time.

Whether you can go after the contractor for a deficiency under the note depends on how you foreclosed. If you foreclosed using the power of sale under the deed of trust, you cannot go after the contractor for any deficiency under the note. This is the most common way to foreclose.

If you did a judicial foreclosure, which is rare, you can get a deficiency judgment against the contractor. Of course, then you have the problem of enforcing the judgment...

Read more
Answered on 11/11/08, 7:36 pm
Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: Contractor's liability

I think the rule for attacking a contractor's bond requires (A) that the contractor (1) have breached a contract (2) for the performance of services requiring a license (3)with you. You meet (1) and (3) because of the default on the loan, but borrowing money on real property doesn't require a person to be licensed, so you don't meet criterion (2). Alternatively (B), that (1) the contractor defrauded you in (2) carrying out some activity requiring a license. Here, he was carrying out an activity requiring a license, but you have not given any facts suggesting fraud.

(I'm not 100% certain of the above limitations on liability of the surety, but this is the way I understand it in my recollection).

So, unless you can show fraud, the bonding company will probably reject your claim. However, it might still be worthwhile to contact them and ask.

Also, as to suit against the contractor, I agree with the previous answer that you probably aren't entitled to seek a deficiency judgment against the contractor, at least at this point, having already foreclosed, but you might have a viable suit for something else, such as waste (if his work damaged the collateral for your loan) or loan-application fraud, neither of which is directly linked to the foreclosure.

Read more
Answered on 11/11/08, 10:31 pm
OCEAN BEACH ASSOCIATES OCEAN BEACH ASSOCIATES

Re: Contractor's liability

Contact me directly if this matter has not been resolved.

Read more
Answered on 12/16/08, 3:55 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California