Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
Disclosure
In the process of buying a home. I pd
$5500 deposit and was pre-approved
for a VA loan. I was supposed to close
escrow on 30 Apr 2009 (did not
close). I received California Property
Tax Disclosure Report dated March
27, 2009 on 30 Apr 2009. Report
disclosed there are $3919.50 in Mello
Roos, 1915 Bonds and other direct
Assessments in addition to AD
Valorem taxes. THis information was
not provided to me or my lender until
30 Apr 2009. My loan has been
declined because my income to debt
ratio is over 55%. Can I get my
deposit back? My realtor says i
cannot.
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Disclosure
If you had been approved for a loan before the disclosure but that approval was removed on account of what later was disclosed, then it seems the seller had failed to inform you of material facts which would void any agreement. On the other hand, if you would have put down the deposit and then tried to get the information to see if you could qualify for a loan, you would not seem to be entitled to a refund. But it seems that they probably quoted a price for the purchase of the house and knew you would rely upon that figure to your detriment, so they negligently mis representated the fees to you. Overall, there are more arguments in your favor than theirs. Find out from your broker why she thinks you can not recover the deposit [demands facts and a legal, logical analysis]. At worst, you can sue in Small Claims Court for up to $7,500.
Re: Disclosure
I agree with Attorney Shers. First, your agent should be in your corner, and not defending the Seller's position (unless she is representing both sides, in which case I wouldn't listen to a word she says). First, financing is almost always a contingency until it funds if the offer was written up on, and accepted in the standard-form CAR contract. Read the agreement, and if the correct boxes were checked making financing a contingency up to close of escrow, then you almost certainly have the right to get your money back. Second, Attorney Shers was pointing toward a second issue here which is were the property taxes readily discoverable by you had you exercised due diligence in your review of matters of public record during the inspection time-frames set forth in your contract? The answer is that they were probably available to you even before you received the Disclosure Report, and therefore there is a chance that you could be legally deemed to have had prior knowledge of the taxes, but failed to object to them (in other words, you could have done your own inspection of public record to determine that there were other taxes, but didn't). Further, in support of the Seller's position, your Preliminary Title Report should have disclosed the tax information as well - not in a format like the Property Tax Disclosure, but at least you may have had notice that there was a problem. Ultimately, I agree with Attorney Shers - you are probably going to have to fight in court over this, and small claims court is probably the correct forum as it is inexpensive, quick and easy.
*Due to the limitations of the LawGuru Forums, The Gibbs Law Firm, APC's (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided is general and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.