Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Disclosure Statement

I purchased a house that contained asbestos in the attic and HVAC system. The disclosure statement at time of sale said "no hazardous materials including asbestos." We have a copy of the statement signed by the agentbut not the seller's signature is not on our copy.The real estate agent represented both buyer and seller.

The seller now lives in Idaho and the agent is taking no responsibility. Cost for removal and abatement of the asbestos and replacement of the HVAC system have totalled over $8000. I have documentation, lab tests and waste manifests for the abatement of the asbestos. I would like to be compensated for my loss; can I request this from the real estate agent along with the seller? Will the seller living out of state be a problem?


Asked on 11/04/99, 8:56 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Jed Somit Jed Somit, Attorney at Law

Re: Disclosure Statement

The disclosure statement is not a warranty. To be able to

sue on a state of facts different than the disclosure, you

must prove that the seller had knowledge of the existence of

the asbestos. If you have such knowledge, you can sue him. His

being out-of-state may complicate matters, but you can sue him

in California (where the contract was to be performed), and the

complications for him will be greater than for you.

If you believe that his agent knew of the presence, or that a competent

real estate agent making a physical inspection would have discovered the

presence of asbestos, you can sue for nondisclosure or negligence. However,

I am not sure of the competence of real estate agents extends that far.

Read more
Answered on 11/08/99, 8:53 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California