Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
Hi;
I owned a house debt free 7 years ago. I was injured and went into teaching, which moved me to a different part of California. I rented my house out, because I wanted to get tenure prior to trying to sell and buy. The housing was going up 20%+ per year and I was advised not to sell my home until I turned 55 y.o., I was 53 1/2 at the time. So I bought a 2nd home that I thought would be close to the value of the 1st home. I tried to sell the 1st home a year and a half later. It was on the market for a year, with no renter. So I re-rented it for another two years. I finally have a buyer. My problem is, I went from having $560K in equity to now being $200K in the hole. When I sell this rental property, I am being told I will pay capital gains. I am selling the 1st house for $375K, I bought it in 1995 for $145K. I am going to make about $40K clear, prior to capital gains. I am actually losing $105K of what I paid off, plus another $70K I put into the house over the years. My primary home is upside down, it is worth $380K. I paid $635K for it and put 20% down from a 1st I took from my other house. I also put $70K into making this 2 bedroom home into a 3 bedroom home. It seems unreal, that on paper it looks like I have capital gains, but in truth, I have major lost. Can I take this to court, and prove these lost, or is it based just on what it appears to look like on paper?
Sincerely,
Dean Newcombe
4 Answers from Attorneys
To answer your question directly, you cannot go into court to change your taxes. You must correctly report your taxable transactions and the tax is what it is. If your accountant tells you there is some "interpretation" available in how you report the numbers, you can take an agressive or conservative approach. If you take the agressive approach and the IRS disagrees, THEN you can go to court for a determination of whether you and your accountant's interpretation is right or the IRS interpretation. That is the only way to get into court: report it as you think is correct with the assistance of an accountant, and then see if the IRS disagrees.
You really need to talk to an accountant about this, not a lawyer. The accountant will tell you if you need a tax lawyer involved, but it is highly unlikely.
Not sure why you were told to wait until you were 55 to sell, unless they thought you could transfer your property taxes. If you had sold withing 3 years after you had moved out of the first house, you probably could have claimed the primary residence exemption, which would have avoided capital gains. Your capital gain is the difference between what you pay for a property and what you sell the property for, minus cost of sales and any improvements. You need to talk to an accountant or tax attorney who is familiar with these issues. There could be a way to avoid the gains, but it would take some time.
I can tell by your long rambling post and poor grammar that you do not teach English. My guess is woodshop. If you don't want to pay capital gains tax, some people do a 1031 tax free exchange. I suggest talking to a real estate attorney, or a tax professional. Other than deductions for mortgage, which should have been taking all along, the fact that the property has depreciated in value is not a defense to the fact that you made some capital gains.
Although your facts are a little hard to follow, I think there's a pretty good chance that if you sit down with a tax advisor who has a good familiarity with the tax rules regarding capital gains on residences and income property, you can come up with enough deductions and offsets to show an overall reportable loss without having to bend the truth at all. Good luck.
Related Questions & Answers
-
What does Durable Power of Attorney to Sell Real Property mean? Asked 5/29/10, 12:39 am in United States California Real Estate and Real Property