Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Landlord/tenant issue

I am in my last month of my lease with intent to move. I submitted my rent late because of confusion if I already paid first/last. My landlord decided to void my check because it was late. (previously they had made considerations on a previous month because I had previously overpaid rent) They did not call me but instead put a three day notice on my front door and in my mailbox. But I did not see the three day notice because I was moving and was not present at my apartment for a week. When I finally was made aware by seeing the notice on my front door, legal filing was already done. I have already paid the rent when I first was made aware of the deficiency however they want me to pay the legal fees. Although they gave me written notice through mail and on my front door. I believe they should have called me as well. (I know perhaps this is not California law). Is there any recourse for me to contest these legal fees? Or would the trouble cost me too much and instead I should just pay the legal fees.


Asked on 5/15/09, 7:45 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

George Shers Law Offices of Georges H. Shers

Re: Landlord/tenant issue

The three day notice was probably invalid. A tenant's obligation is to "tender" [present to the other person] the rent money and whether or not the landlord then cashes it or not does not matter, the rent has been "paid". Afterall, the complete defense to a three day notice is tendering the rent to the landlord before those three days expire; obviously in that situation the rent is late. I vaguely recall that there is a place on the complaint filed for a three day notice asking if any part ofthe rent was paid. If the landlord could just refuse to accept a check unless it contained any applicable penalties or service charges then if a tenant mails the full payment Monday on Tuesday when the landlord gets it in the mail, there is another day of interest charges and the landlord could refuse that check and the tenant would not be in compliance until they over paid.

So the landlord was not entitled to file a three day notice suit; since the suit could be voided [if the correct legal defense above were presented] and the attorney should have known to ask the landlord if you had tried to pay, the reasonable value [the word reasonable is automatically added to the phrase legal fees] of the legal work was at best zero [since it would have cost the landlord time and money to go to court with the complaint, it can be argued the value is a negative number].

So tell the landlord that you want several things: a) a stipulation that he has to file in court setting aside any judgment entered aqnd dismissing with prejudice the suit and any other rental suits against you from that landlord; b) a letter from him stating that there had been an error on his part that resulted in the suit being filed and the three day notice being given and that you in fact had paid the rent;c) a letter for all the credit card companies stating that you had paid the rent and he was wrong to give your a three day notice, file suit, and take judgment when he was not legally entitled to do so; d) an apology to you for creating the situation: e) a payment of $250 to you for emotional injuries unless all of this is resolved within 10 business days; f) his arranging for no one, including his lawyer, contacting you to try to get money from you for this incident. In return you will sign an agreement not to sue him for the damages caused you.

Read more
Answered on 5/16/09, 1:44 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California