Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Mortgage liability dilemma

My wife and I each have a house as sole and separate propertys and we purchased them before we were married. Although we do file jointly with taxes, I am not on her mortgage and she's not on mine. She is behind on her mortgage and is considering letting it go back to the bank. Can I be held liable for any of her house issues? If so, what can I do to protect my ASSets?


Asked on 7/09/08, 1:29 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Robert Mccoy Law Office Of Robert McCoy

Re: Mortgage liability dilemma

You probably can be indirectly held liable for your wife's debts. If your wife's bank sues her for a deficiency after foreclosure and obtains a judgment, the bank can go after assets held solely in your name if those assets are community property.

In order to keep assets from being deemed to be community property, you need to do more than just hold them in your name alone as your "separate property." You need to have a written agreement, called a transmutation, signed by your wife stating that the property is your separate property and she has no claim to it. Note that transmutations involve tricky legal issues, so you should get a lawyer to assist you in preparing the agreement. Note that it is recommended that you and your wife have separate lawyers to assist each of you with this agreement.

Read more
Answered on 7/09/08, 7:41 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California