Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
My mother will be getting remarried soon and wants to avoid any legal battles with her new husband and her children regarding our family home (since California is a community property state). She would like to transfer the title ONLY (not the loan) via a Quit Claim Deed into mine and my sister�s names. Would there be any negatives/drawbacks to doing this should I want to purchase my own first home in the future? Will this disqualify me from programs such as the First Time Homebuyer credit since there is a property associated to my name, even though it is not my primary residence and I have no ties to the home loan itself? I want to be sure I fully understand the responsibility I am taking on should I choose to sign the Quit Claim Deed. Thank you very much for any and all help!
3 Answers from Attorneys
What your mother plans to do is the worst possible thing to do to solve the very legitimate concerns she has. First off, it will be an event of default on the loan, and may result in immediate foreclosure. Lenders get very grouchy when the borrower gives away their security, even though the security interest stays attached to the property. When the borrower no longer owns the property, the chances of default go up astronomically, and banks hate that regardless of any good intentions by the borrower. Second, it may subject your mother to gift tax on the equity in the house. Third, it will lose you the capital gains tax benefits you would receive if the house does not transfer to you until she dies (such as by a trust or will). Fourth, as you guessed, it will disqualify you from first time home buyer programs. They are designed to give people a chance to buy real property for the first time, not for people who already own a property. Lastly, if she continues to pay the mortgage out of earnings after the marriage, she will still face community property issues in the event of divorce, because she will have paid the mortgate with community funds. Your mother needs to talk to an attorney who knows pre-nuptual agreements and estate planning to come up with an appropriate plan to deal with her concerns. Her current plan would be a disaster.
The preferred way to do inter-generation property transfers and keep property and wealth in the desired descendant channel is through lawyer-designed trusts -- saves taxes, disputes, avoids probate, etc. and will not trigger due-on-sale clauses in the existing financing.
If your mother owns the house prior to marriage, and it is titled in her name, there is a strong presumption that it is her separate property. Separate property does not become community property just because of marriage. Both Mr. Whipple and Mr. McCormick have pointed out problems and what needs to be done.
I strongly suggest that you have your mother sit down with an attorney competent in estate planning, rather than simply quit claiming property to other people for what appears to be an irrational fear.