Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Neighbor removes trees hanging in their yar

The people living behind us took it upon themselves to hire a tree trimmer and wack off the branches of our trees that were hanging over into their yard. Please note the following: 1)the branches in question were at the upppermost part of a 30 - 50 ft slope above ground level on our side of the property line. 2) no request was ever made by them asking us to remove the branches hanging over the fence on their side of the wall - had they requested we remove the branches and we failed to do so I could see where they might have cause to proceed with the action they chose to take. 3)The supposed expert tree trimmers they hired and paid for - again without consulting us or at least giving the opportunity to clear the hanging branches - have ruined the trees - the branches were wacked off at the tree trunk - imagine trees with an 180 degree front full of branches in my backyard facing the backside of my house and an additional 180 degree back that does not exist except for the trunk.

Can they legally cut off our branches without our consent or at least giving us the opportunity to rectify a site that was apparently unacceptable to them?


Asked on 2/01/03, 5:51 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: Neighbor removes trees hanging in their yar

Here's my view of where the law on overhanging branches stands. There may be recent cases I'm not aware of.

First, even though you own the trees, if the branches overhang a neighbor's property, they are a trespass. However, courts are cautious about giving the 'injured party' all the usual rights of one who is trepassed against, because this kind of trespass is considered pretty trivial. The neighbor probably can't sue successfully for money damages. The most the courts would allow is for the neighbor to trim the branches at the property line. The relative aggressiveness of trimming that would be permissible would further depend upon whether the limbs constituted a 'nuisance' or were 'noxious.' I suppose this means that if they are a windstorm hazard or spread dirty leaves, needles, seeds, etc. more aggressive pruning would be reasonable. In the case of tree roots, they are 'noxious' or a 'nuisance' when they cause sewer plugging, foundation breakage, etc.

The party cutting the limbs or roots of the neighboring tree must do so in a non-negligent way. I would interpret that to mean in a way that does not endanger the tree or make it likely to topple.

There is less of a duty to trim in a way that preserves the esthetic qualities of the tree(s). I suppose courts would say the neighbor should perform the limb removal with some regard for the appearance of the finished job, but the owner has no right to expect trespassing portions of limbs to be left in place just for esthetic balance.

All in all, I think you are justifiably upset about the lack of communication and the sloppy job, but to a point the neighbor had a right to cut without notice. He may have exceeded that right, but on the other hand your indignation may be a little excessive.

You might want to have your own arborist and a local real-estate attorney look at the situation together, and advise you on the basis of an on-site review of whether actionable negligence has occurred.

Read more
Answered on 2/03/03, 1:41 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California