Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
After asking neighbors permission to replace a section of fence with retaining wall, and completing the wall, we get a letter stating that they believe the fence is encroaching. We replied that we did not move the fence and it has been in that location since 1967. They demanded we get a survey to which we replied that we could not afford one but they were welcome to. Next, we received a sketch of a section of the property line and flags in our yard,apparently from a surveyor, and a 3000.00 bill to go with it. We refused to pay the bill but said we would move the fence if we could review the complete survey and/or speak with the surveyor to be certain that their survey qualifies as official. We're only talking about 300 square feet of land. Their attorney said he would look into that possibility. We did not hear from him. Next, we receive summons from a different attorney at the same firm and we are being sued for trespassing, damages, attorney fees, etc. Even though this has dragged out over a year, we thought we were cooperating with them! We cannot afford an attorney and court fees. We sent another letter stating, again, that we were willing to cooperate and do not have financial means to battle in court and would like to see the survey. By the way, this guy has money to burn. Any advice? We need to respond to the compliant within 20 days. Does he have the right to request damages and his attorney fees when he gave us permission to build, then decided it was wrong? Thanks.
1 Answer from Attorneys
I would be remiss if I did not advise you to hire an attorney to help you with your response.
That aside, here are some ideas for drafting your answer.
A defense that you might propose is that the neighbor's claim is barred by the California 5-year statutute of limitations set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 318, which provides: "No action for the recovery of real property, or for the recovery of the possession thereof, can be maintained, unless it appear that the plaintiff, his ancestor, predecessor, or grantor, was seized or possessed of the property in question, within five years before the commencement of the action." Because your neighbor has been out of possession of the property for more than five years, his claim is barred.
You might also think about making a counterclaim for declaratory relief (quiet title) based upon California Code of Civil Procedure Section 325, which provides:
"For the purpose of constituting an adverse possession by a person claiming title, not founded upon a written instrument, judgment, or decree, land is deemed to have been possessed and occupied in the following cases only:
"First--Where it has been protected by a substantial inclosure.
"Second--Where it has been usually cultivated or improved.
"Provided, however, that in no case shall adverse possession be considered established under the provision of any section or sections of this Code, unless it shall be shown that the land has been occupied and claimed for the period of five years continuously, and the party or persons, their predecessors and grantors, have paid all the taxes, State, county, or municipal, which have been levied and assessed upon such land."
Basicly you are asking the judge to order that the property on your side of the fence belongs entirely to you because you and your predecessors have enclosed, possessed, improved and cultivated it, and have excluded the neighbor from it, openly, notoriously and hostilely, for five years.
To acquire title this way, by adverse possession, you also need to prove that you paid taxes on it for five years, also. I am not aware of any cases on this, but you might try arguing that the county assessor, when it inspects the property from time to time, probably assumes that the property on your side of the fence is yours and assesses you accordingly, and that you would expect your tax bill to go down and the neighbors to go up if you are forced to move the fence.
If the judge does not buy that argument regarding your (and your predecessors) having essentially paid the taxes for more than five years, he/she should at least give you a prescriptive easement over that sliver of property because you have met all of the requirements for adverse possession except for payment of taxes. An easement gives you the right to continue to occupy the property forever the same way you have been but leaves title vested in the neighbor. It would be a quite satisfactory outcome for you. You get the right to continue to use the property and maintain the fence where it is without having to pay taxes on it.