Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
Party A sells a restaurant that he closed for several years to Party B. Party after buying the place finds Party A old recipes book. Party A wants them back. Party A sues Party B to get recipes back..
What are Party A chances of winning from one of the following arguments?
1.Party A not prevail because he should have known about the missing reciped
2. Party A not prevail because the sale of the restaurant includes everything in tit.
3. Party A prevail because there was no mutual assent
4. Party A prevail because the sale of the restaurant includes nothing in it.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Sounds like a law-school hypothetical. We don't do those. Actually, if the restaurant closed while A was using those recipes, I'd say they are worthless anyway.
This was an episode of Seinfeld.