Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
I own property in California. On my land, there is a permanent structure (there for decades) directly over the sewer easement. Am I financially responsible for removal of that building, even if the building predated the city ordinance which prohibits permanent structures over sewer easements? Furthermore, I've been told a California law prohibits permanent structures over sewer easements. Do you the code/section of that law? Thank you very much.
-john m.
2 Answers from Attorneys
This is a fairly arcane question and not one I can answer from memory. Generally, however, I can tell you that the city ordinance is probably not the main source of your problem. The owner of land burdened by an easement cannot build a structure that interferes with the easement. No sewer line lasts forever, and when the one under your structure fails, the owner of the easement rights will have the right to dig it up and replace it. At that point you will face the possibility of having to demolish the encroaching structure at your expense.
As for the law that prohibits permenant structures over sewer easments, again, I would have to look that up, and legal research is beyond the scope of a free Q&A service. There may be a Health and Safety Code section that governs it, but my guess is that it is covered by local building codes. Because of the way most cities and counties enact their building codes, you may not find it expressly stated in the ordinance either. Most cities and counties have an ordinance that adopts the uniform building codes, and then only sets out any exceptions or modifications. The other source of law prohibiting permenant structures over sewer easements would be the common law of easements I mentioned above, which would require case-law research to find.
I will not say that you are not responsible. However, the structure may be grandfathered in. Is the city asking you to remove it? There may be ways to argue that an easement does not give them the right to tell you what to do with your property, and see if they will give you a no-action letter rather than spend tax dollars litigating it.
Let me know if you would like me to represent you.
Daniel Bakondi, Esq.
415-450-0424
The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi
870 Market Street, Suite 1161
San Francisco CA 94102
www.danielbakondi.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential information, privileged information, or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient or received this message in error, any use or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited and unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately, and delete this message. No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. Nothing communicated or provided constitutes legal advice nor a legal opinion unless it so specifies and written agreement for attorney services has been entered into. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not act in time. Thank you.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Can a non-attorney own a law firm in California? Asked 3/26/10, 8:30 am in United States California Real Estate and Real Property