Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

if the property was foreclosed by the bank & an unlawful detainer was served,can we stay up to 90 days since i have a tenant occupying a room in my house?


Asked on 7/17/11, 3:48 am

4 Answers from Attorneys

George Shers Law Offices of Georges H. Shers

You would be able to stay until the unlawful detainer trial results in a judgment and the sheriff serves the writ of possession on you. How long that will take varies county to county as to their schedules; you can call both to find out. A tenant being in the house should not extend your lack of rights to remain.

Read more
Answered on 7/17/11, 7:33 am
Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

I pretty much agree with Mr. Shers. At most, the tenant might be allowed to stay, but even that requires a pretty liberal interpretation of the Tenants' Rights in Foreclosure Act, a defense of the unlawful detainer suit on that ground by or on behalf of the tenant, and proof that the tenant is indeed a tenant and not a guest or a lodger.

Read more
Answered on 7/17/11, 8:01 am

If you only have one person renting a room in your house, they are a lodger, not a tenant. If you had a rooming house with multiple tenants, it would raise an interesting question, but given that you only have one, you're all out of luck.

Read more
Answered on 7/17/11, 10:49 am
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

I agree with Mr. McCormick and Mr. Whipple. The Protecting Tenants in Foreclosure Act of 2009 would not protect you, because you are the original trustor. I doubt it would protect the preson renting the room, because as Mr. McCormick points out, that is a lodger and not a tenant.

Read more
Answered on 7/17/11, 12:01 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California