Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
quit claim and mortgage assumption
I quit claimed my house to my ex-wife 5 years ago. I still remain as primary on the mortgage note which also remains on my credit. I have tired to have my name removed but was told by the mortgage company she would have to assume the loan in her name alone. Our divorce paperwork states ''the petitioner shall be awarded...the family residence located at...together with all obligations thereon.'' (and she has been making all the payments on her own since). Also stated is ''wife is ordered to diligently act to become self sufficient'' as she was not working at the time, that is why she could not assume the loan at the time of the divorce.
Is there any way I can legally force her to assume the loan in order to remove my name from the note?
Thank you,
M Graham
4 Answers from Attorneys
Re: quit claim and mortgage assumption
You need to talk to your divorce attorney to see what steps are necessary to compel your ex wife to comply with the Court's order. You signed as a borrower, so the order has no binding effect on the lender. This is something that you need to work out with your ex.
Re: quit claim and mortgage assumption
The statute of limitations for suits to enforce judgments is ten years (Code of Civil Procedure section 337.5).
Most home loans more than five years old can be refinanced advantageously; first, because rathes and credit requirements are more favorable; and second, because most properties have a lot more equity, due both to appreciation of market prices and the gradual pay-off of the existing loan.
It should be quicker and easier to persuade her to refinance in her own name that to go to court to have a judge find a way to enforce the judgment. But the fact that you probably could do so, if push came to shove, could be an additional persuasion for her to refinance voluntarily.
Re: quit claim and mortgage assumption
It appears the Court Order does not require her to refinance, so, no, probably not. If she not following Court Order you may be able to get an order having her comply, but that would not generally require refinance.
JOEL SELIK Attorney at Law
800-894-2889 760-479-1515 702-243-1930
www.SelikLaw.com
Licensed to Practice Law in California and Nevada Only CA Licensed Real Estate Broker
CONCENTRATING IN LITIGATION: REAL ESTATE, ELDER ABUSE, APPEALS, AND COLLECTIONS Personal Injury, Contracts, Tax Matters, Business, Malpractice, Appeals, Elder Neglect/Abuse/Nursing Home Malpractice Real Estate, and Other Legal Matters
This is just general information. No representations are made and no attorney client relationship is established by this communication. In most matters there are strict time limitations within which actions may be taken or your rights will be compromised. We are not taking any action on your matter and will not be considered your attorney or tax representative until both you and we have signed a fee agreement.
We, therefore will take no action on your behalf unless a written retainer agreement is signed. There are strict deadlines, called statutes of limitation, within which claims or lawsuits must be filed. Therefore, if you do not retain SELIKLAW, you should immediately seek the services of another attorney or other advisor.
If you send a lawyer or law firm email, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via email. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties.
Re: quit claim and mortgage assumption
The divorce court retains jurisdiction to enforce its orders. Refinancing is silly now that the interest rates are once again climbing.
You should talk to an experienced family law attorney who is also familiar with real estate. Unlike simple civil actions, the family court is vested with a remedy known as contempt when one of the parties refuses to comply with court orders. I would not recommend contempt until other methods had failed, however, especially if you still have custody issues involving children.
The fact that you signed the promissory note means that you are personally liable under the loan. In the event of foreclosure, however, the lender is required to exhaust the security first and would only go after you if the sale of the security (the house) did not satisfy the remaining balance of the mortgage. That situation is known as a deficiency judgment. Lenders who foreclose nonjudicially (through a trustee's sale) cannot obtain a deficiency judgment. They can only be obtained through a lawsuit, and there are many more requirements for the lender to comply with to obtain a deficiency judgment against you.
I would not be that worried about being personally named on the note at this time. I hope that this answers your question to some extent.
Very truly yours,