Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
Real Estate: Refinancing a Mortgage
My brother owns a house with a variable rate mortgage. He wants to refinance for a lower rate, but his credit has been ruined due to an elective foreclosure on another property. He believes that if he transfers ownership of the house to me, I will be able to refinance at a much lower rate (my credit is still excellent). I rent and hope to buy my first home in the next 5 yrs. My brother will continue making payments on this property and there is no danger of him being able to continue to do so, since his salary more than covers it. What is the best way to achieve this (be able to re-fi at a lower rate) without setting myself up for significant risk or hurting my chances of getting a good loan when I choose to buy a home of my own? I am a single woman, 25yrs old, earning $75K/yr in San Francisco.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Real Estate: Refinancing a Mortgage
Here are some random thoughts:
1. Has your brother really tried to refinance, especially with his current lender? A current lender is often more willing to do a refi because they don't increase their exposure to default, they probably marginally reduce it because they still have the same $X of low-score loan on the books as before, but the borrower is less likely to default if the rate is lower.
2. Remember that rates on owner-occupied homes are lower than non-owner-occupied; you won't get the best rate even with your good credit.
3. To do this, I'm assuming he would sell the house to you at fair market value, and you would use the proceeds of your new first to pay off his existing loan. If the house is worth approximately the amount of the loan, no cash would have to change hands, and tax effects would be minimal.
4. You would need a lease specifying a rental that covered the payments you'd be making, which might include property taxes if there were an impound account.
5. The biggest problem might be reversing the ownership - selling it back to him - in the future.
A sale and purchase would require both of you not only to want to do it (or an ironclad contract) and to have the ability to carry it out.
6. Even if there are no adverse tax consequences of doing today's part of the deal, the sale-back could, nay likely would, impact someone's taxes.
7. While you are tied up owning brother's house, it would be more difficult to finance a house of your own, although no one can predict future availability or cost of credit for second homes.
8. If you do this, have a lawyer review the specifics, have a title company handle escrow, closing and documentation, and don't misrepresent to anyone what it going on.
9. Deals like this require good faith and personal integrity on the part of the principals, and even so can go awry for reasons that could not be predicted at the outset.
10. There may be ways to structure the deal that I didn't discuss in this answer.