Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
My wife owns a home that she qualified for and bought back in 2005. We were told back then I didnt qualify due to credit so I am not on the loan. Looking at the paperwork it is fradulent and the numbers for her income are not correct and actually reflect my income. We have been making it for 6 years and now my wife has health issues which are forcing her to go on disability. The 2500.00 per month P/I payment is going to become a burden. The house is upside down and I am thinking about doing a Short sale or having her foreclose on the house. In the meantime I am a retired diabled veteran and eligible for a VA loan. Is is against any law for me to buy a second home, move and then Short sale or foreclose on our exisiting property? What are the ramifications. I appreciate your answers and help.
1 Answer from Attorneys
I am not clear on the facts. In the first sentence of your question, you say your wife owns a home. Then, in the third to last sentence, you ask if it is OK "for me" to buy a second home, then you mention "our" existing property.
Also, I'm wondering who is responsible for the fraudulent paperwork with incorrect income figures....you, your wife, or a loan arranger or broker? In general, it's risky to do anything with a loan obtained with a fraudulent application except to pay it in full, because you can be sued for the fraud without much help from the antideficiency statutes.
As far as buying a second home, moving, and then dumping the upside-down house by short sale or foreclosure, I can't think of anything that makes it illegal per se, but if you have to conceal any facts from anyone involved - the VA, the seller, the lender on the previous house, ro your wife - that would taint the deal and probably introduce some illegality. In particular, I'd be concerned about a possible lender investigation of the existing loan and also whether the VA loan to you would go through if your wife is in default. I assume the VA lender would inquire about her finances as well as yours, since the loan payments would be made (at least in part, I would assume) with community income.