Legal Question in Traffic Law in California
Chain Reaction Rear End:Who is at fault?
I was recently involved in a chain reaction accident where I was the third and last car. The first car had braked and the driver of the second car (the car in front of me) was not looking forward. That driver did not hit the brakes and therefore rear ended the car in front of it. I then was not able to stop before hitting this car. I assume I am still at fault, I was just wondering if the fact that the driver ahead of me had not hit the brakes had any significance. Also, the driver of the car I rear ended was the only one that needed medical attention. Will I likely be responsible for that persons injury and any costs resulting from it?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Chain Reaction Rear End:Who is at fault?
This is going to be an apportionment situation. You and the driver in front of you are each somewhat responsible for the damages. This gets quite complicated, but he will probably make a claim against you claiming that you caused him to be injured. Your insurance company will defend you and argue that he injured himself when he struck the car in front of him. Ultimately, they will either settle or let a jury determine how much at fault you were.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Liability my son was driving my truck and had an accedent he is on my insurance... Asked 12/24/06, 6:08 pm in United States California Traffic Law
-
No police report i was hit by driver. i didnt file a police report. all his... Asked 12/20/06, 8:15 pm in United States California Traffic Law
-
Small Claims Court I was hit from behind and suffered property damage and personal... Asked 12/10/06, 7:51 pm in United States California Traffic Law
-
Dui but no miranda rights i got pulled over the other day by a CHP and i had a few... Asked 12/08/06, 6:51 pm in United States California Traffic Law