Legal Question in Traffic Law in California
For a speeding ticket or other criminal infraction, the necessary corpus delecti consisting of the two elements: the fact of injury or loss or harm and the existence of criminal agency as its cause, don't exist. So does that mean that all victimless crimes cannot be admissible into court?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Your analysis is flawed. The corpus rule is when the prosecution must establish the corpus (body of the crime or the elements) by a very small burden of proof before they can introduce a defendant's statement.
Speeding ticket scenario: Officer, fully certified in use and operation of the radar device visually estimates a car on the freeway going 85 mph. He brings up the radar, gets a lock and gets a reading of 86 mph. He pulls the car over and issues a citation. The defendant pleads not guilty and sets it for trial. At trial, the officer comes in and testifies about their observations and the radar speed. Corpus satisfied, elements met, defendant guilty.
Read further on what the corpus rule is. Do a Google search for "corpus cop out"
Related Questions & Answers
-
I was recently given a ticket for spitting a sunflower seed out while driving down... Asked 12/10/15, 11:33 am in United States California Traffic Law
-
I got a proof of service code 40505 which says violation 1 s/b marked misd and... Asked 11/25/15, 3:35 am in United States California Traffic Law
-
Last month I was stopped for talking on my cell phone while driving. It was on... Asked 11/20/15, 4:51 am in United States California Traffic Law
-
I got a ticket for running a red light, I went to court asked for community service... Asked 11/16/15, 2:42 pm in United States California Traffic Law