Legal Question in Wills and Trusts in California
Brother contested trust.
A living trust was drafted and executed in October 2001 per mother's request. Mother suffered from dementia and I was her only care provider (of three boys) so I made all the arrangements. A few years later, brother�s uncontested petition to become her conservator is granted by the court. Brother puts mother in �a home� then files an unlawful detainer action against me stating his authority to do so is as her conservator acting on her behalf. (Mother is completely oblivious to any of this�) I argue in court that the house is in a trust (submitting the trust as evidence) stating he is conservator of the estate and the house is in a trust therefore not part of the estate under his control. Brother contests the validity of the trust in court and judge continues hearing for one week to review trust and conservatorship. Judge returns and rules in favor of the trust as it pre-dates conservatorship.
Mother passed last week. Trust and will are very specific regarding any beneficiary contesting the validity, etc. of either document. Should any beneficiary directly or indirectly contest the validity of trust or will in any court etc., their interest in any inheritance or any trust asset will be zero. (Not exact language on docs
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Brother contested trust.
This is a good question, one of the more difficult ones I have seen on LawGuru. I assume the rest of your question is whether or not the other brother falls under the no contest clause by challenging its validity during your Mother's life.
A quick review of relevant case law and statutes did not provide any definitive answer to your question. As such it will most likely be a question decided by the court system. Due to this fact, there are several factors which affect the outcome to this question, of which we need more information to give you a complete answer. Such information includes: how the EXACT wording of the no-contest clause is stated; the exact argument your brother made against the validity of the trust and the grounds for which he filed the unlawful detainer action in the first place; the ruling of the judge in the unlawful detainer action; and a couple of other factors dealing with very fact specific issues. Furthermore, even with all of the previous mentioned information falling in your favor, it would still rest on what standards the judge uses to interpret the no contest clause. Generally, in California, such clauses are held to a strict interpretation which would fall in your favor.
This is most likely, if challenged by your brother, going to be a costly and drawn out legal battle. I would definitely weigh whether it is worth the trouble, family strife (looks like this is already present) and expenses to enforce the no-contest clause. If there is a sizable amount in the trust, and you desire to enforce the clause against your brother, I would definitely speak to an attorney about this. You need someone that can handle both trust administration and probate litigation. If you are within our region (Sacramento area) feel free to give us a call. Regardless, you should probably speak to a couple of attorneys before deciding, since this case is potentially complicated.