Legal Question in Workers Comp in California

Workmen's Comp Claim

My adult son (28) was injured at

work 7/05 (he is a finish carpenter).

He received a 6 inch cut across his

face (from his nose to the side of his

face) when a grinding tool kicked

back into his face. The laceration

was repaired by a plastic surgeon

that day. (We do have photos of his

injury). He obviously has a scar. He

also has some numbness on his

nose. He missed 3 weeks of work

(per the doctor's request). He went

to an attorney over a year ago. He

has been contacting the attorney

every few weeks to months regarding

the status. First he was promised he

would receive his 3 weeks lost wages

immediately, separate from a

settlement for his injury. He has not

received anything to date. Last

Friday he received a call from the

attorney's assistant stating that the

insurance company offered him

$9000 (for both the lost wages and

the injury). This seems very low. A

general contractor we know told us,

based on his past experience, that a

facial disfigurement should be must

higher. We would appreciate

anyone's opinion.

Thank you!


Asked on 11/26/07, 9:16 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

George Shers Law Offices of Georges H. Shers

Re: Workmen's Comp Claim

You do not state it, but I assume he was working for a contractor who had a contract to do some work for a third party. In that situation, your son has two different remedies.

For the Workers' Comp. case, by law they must pay the three weeks lost wages [should have been done within 2 weeks of reporting injury]up to a certain maximum amount based upon his wages. They must also pay for all medical treatment necessary to cure or relieve from the effects of the injury. And he is entitled to permanent disability payments, but those will be fairly low in amount because a scar does not prevent his working [[might be only 1-2% PD]. That case should have been resolved a long time ago. Not knowing the cost of the medical treatment, I have no idea if the $9,000 offer is from the WC carrier or not.

He may or may not have a civil suit against the maker of the equipment or the owner of the premises where he was working. You do not present enough information as to how the accident occurred for me to know the answer to that. He can not sue his employer unless the contractor had no WC coverage.

He should make an appointment for wlithin the next few weeks with the attorney and demand that he tell him what he has done, glive him a copy of all the pleadings lin the case, expalin the bails of the $9,000 offer and find out what his demand was, etc. If the attorney will not provide that basic information, fire them right then, demand a copy of your entire file, and find a new attorney [one for the WCAB case and one for the product liability matter]. Getting a anew attorney for the civil case should not result in any increase in attorney fees.

Good luck.

Read more
Answered on 12/25/07, 7:49 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Workers' Compensation Law questions and answers in California