Legal Question in Family Law in Colorado
Clarify what determines a common law marriage, is a divorce necessary, there cou
My boyfriend was in a relationship for about 7 years. At no time did his ex girlfriend use his last name or be referred to as his "wife". A form was signed for insurance purposes only (she was pregnant with thier child who is now 5 and she needed health insurance). I believe, but have not seen, the insurance paper may have stated they were common law married so she could receive the insurance coverage. They have never formally registered as common law married with the state of Colorado. Is a "divorce" necessary. The only reason the issue has come up is because she is starting to ask for child support. Presently, they have equal time with the child. Custody issues will have to be dealt with, as she is not a reasonable type of woman and as the child gets older he will need more stability, one "home" so to speak. Other than the child, there are no joint assets (car, home, etc.). Is it really necessary for him to go through a divorce process, or can he just deal the custody issues when it becomes necessary? It is my (and his!) hope that since they never registered as married, they do not legally need a divorce.
Thank you for your time.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Clarify what determines a common law marriage, is a divorce necessary, there
The insurance form may be sufficient, should the old girlfriend choose to claim they are married. She can get child support, whether or not they are married, but she will need to motion the court to obtain it. The custody issue would also need to be put before the court, if the issue is to be decided. If she and your boyfriend do nothing, the informal relationship can continue. The old girlfriend may, however, also have a case that she is entitled to a significant portion of the assets your boyfriend has accumulated since the insurance paper was signed--including assets he might gain, should the two of you attempt to get "married." While you indicate that there are no joint assets, in fact, if she is successful in getting the court to recognize the common law marriage, the court may also consider any assts your boyfriend has acqired since the insurance paper was signed to be joint or marital assets. In other words, it may be in your boyfriends interest to get the divorce in order to end the time period on which the old girlfriend might have a claim on his assets. To put it bluntly, your boyfriend may still have a considerable amount of baggage resulting from having fathered a child and sought insurance coverage for the birth of that child. It may not be so easy to make that go away.