Legal Question in Administrative Law in Florida

Re: pro-se litigant as a witness for himself

You would make a statement and then be cross examined.

Re: pro-se litigant as a witness for himself

NOTE: This communication is not intended as and should not be interpreted as legal advice. Rather, it is intended solely as a general discussion of legal principles. You should not rely on or take action based on this communication without first presenting ALL relevant details to a competent attorney in your jurisdiction and then receiving the attorney's individualized advice for you. By reading the "Response" to your question or comment, you agree that the opinion expressed is not intended to, nor does it, create any attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. If you do not agree, then stop right here, and do not read any further.

Generally a pro se litigant simply makes a statement and is then cross examined by opposing counsel. This method is not very effective as there is no opportunity to object to any improper questions, ability to think and make notes for cross examination or have an opportunity to ask questions of your key witness on rebuttal. You would probably have a much better chance at victory with an attorney on your side.

Scott R. Jay, Esq.