Legal Question in Consumer Law in Florida
If party1 signs a contract based on what party2 is representing verbally and party1 finds out a few days later that what party2 told them would be provided was not and reviewed the contract more in detail and in the contract it says that party2 does not need to provide those services / support and has not expressed, promissed or implied that, and you signed is this contract still legally binding? Despite that fact party2 told party1 verbally that it would be provided and was the main reason party1 signed the contract to start with?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Anything outside of the contract generally will not be considered. There may even be a provision in the contract that actually says that it is the entire agreement between the parties and no outside communications change the agreement. That's why it's important to always read a contract before you sign it.
Related Questions & Answers
-
My father just passed away. He had paid for a prepaid cremation in 1999. We just... Asked 10/03/09, 12:05 pm in United States Florida Consumer Law
-
Is it illegal for debt collectors to call a debtor's family members house even if... Asked 10/03/09, 11:41 am in United States Florida Consumer Law
-
What is Florida Statute on an interest upon interest collection Asked 10/02/09, 9:55 am in United States Florida Consumer Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
