Legal Question in Criminal Law in Florida

If an officer makes a signed report the date of the incident which in no way refers to any sort of consent to enter a residence and then nine months later has a sworn testimony stating that he did have consent, is that enough to not make it an illegal search and seizure?


Asked on 1/21/12, 11:53 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Burt Stutchin Harris & Stutchin

No, however, the motion to suppress should highlight the absence of the mention of consent in the first report as this tends to show that the later affidavit is a fabrication. In the end, it is up the judge to determine whether or not consent to search had been freely and voluntarily given.

Read more
Answered on 1/23/12, 5:38 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in Florida