Legal Question in Criminal Law in Illinois
Is there a difference between ET HOC PARATUS EST VERIFI- CARE and NOLO CONTENDERE. Please if yes, give example.
1 Answer from Attorneys
While each is a "plea", "Et hoc . . . " is an old form (Latin) used primarily in civil cases where the party is saying there is something I would testify to that could seemingly go against me but in reality is a kind of defense, so it usually went at the end of other responsive pleadings. Today we might consider this an "affirmative defense" that says something like "so what if . . . it still doesn't matter". On the other hand, "nolo" is an actual plea that says "I give up but don't want to say anything" and usually is used in a criminal case to say "ok find me guilty but I'm not really prepared to admit to anything". Hope this helps.
Related Questions & Answers
-
If someone representing a company secretly records a conversation (eavesdroping)... Asked 10/01/12, 7:07 pm in United States Illinois Criminal Law
-
I was charged with retail theft and was arrested. I was given a citation and a... Asked 9/30/12, 1:37 pm in United States Illinois Criminal Law
-
After researching my case it qualifies to be expunged. All 3 counts qualify to be... Asked 9/27/12, 11:16 am in United States Illinois Criminal Law