Legal Question in Banking Law in India
Dear Sirs,
The bank has filed case before the DRT and defendents are:
1. The Company
2. Director A (Guarantor and 51% shareholder)
3. Director B (Guarantor and 49% shareholder)
Director B has appeared before the DRT on reciept of summons.
Director A has repeatedly failed to appear before the DRT despite having received the summons.
No on has appeared on behalf of the company as yet.
Can Director B also appear on behalf of the Company?
If yes, what are the implications and precautions to be taken?
What problems maybe caused by Director A in the proceedings?
How to overcome them?
What would happen if no one represents the company?
(The assets have already been taken over by the bank under SARFAESI Act)
Appreciate your kind advice.
Best regards.
2 Answers from Attorneys
If the company is not represented by anybody, B the director, if he is interested, can claim to represent the company and plead its and his case in opposition to the proceeding before DRT. Directors have a fiduciary relationship to the company. If the assets of the company have been taken over by the Bank under SARFAESI Act, if there are valid objections to the said proceedings, B as director on behalf of the company can file application under Sec.17 of the SARFAEASI Act, provided, the said application is within time i.e. 45 days from Sec.13(4) notice or to file an application to condone the delay. You must write to those actually holding the company's books and assets to provide you with necessary inputs to oppose the application before the DRT. If the managing director,(in case there is one) you must write to him to represent the company and on his failure to do so, you will be representing the company to protect the company's interests in the pending application. It all depends on what valid grounds of defence are available for the company. If there are valid grounds, you can represent the company on account of the failure of those actually in charge of the day to day affairs of the company to protect its interests and also claim the costs of such defence from the company. If the company is defunct, you have to expend your own moneys. Better weigh the materials and get the assistance of local lawyer in this matter.
I agree with the above
Related Questions & Answers
-
I am a cashier working with pvt bank. made a third party payment though slight... Asked 8/27/09, 2:44 am in India Banking Law
-
If a person dies who is having a personal loan. Who is responsible for repayment? Asked 8/26/09, 7:48 am in India Banking Law
-
A purchaser of property in SARFAESI Act is insisting that apart from the sale... Asked 8/25/09, 11:43 pm in India Banking Law
-
Dear sir, i have quesion for section 406 and 420 IPC. MY father works in bank as... Asked 8/25/09, 6:32 pm in India Banking Law
-
Dear Sir, This is a question on Insurance . My sister was named the nominee of the... Asked 8/25/09, 2:48 am in India Banking Law