Legal Question in Banking Law in India

Law of limitation

I took from one of my borrower an unstamped acknowledgement of debt owed by him to bank.Are the interests of Bank safe as the borrower is saying that Bank can not recover amount as his acknowledgement is unstamped.Will in such case loan documents be treated as time barred.Pl advise .


Asked on 3/20/09, 1:28 am

4 Answers from Attorneys

Prof.Somnath Mukherjee s.mukherjee associates,09874053359

Re: Law of limitation

If you take a loan you have to pay the same. The plea which you have taken cannot be tenable.

Read more
Answered on 3/21/09, 2:38 am
J. Radhakrishnan independent Practice

Re: Law of limitation

Acknowledgment of debt does not require stamp duty so held by Bombay High Court. You may find the ruling in AIR Bombay between 1980 to 1987. Look up in any latest text book on Limitation Act under Sec.18 thereof. Many stamp Acts define acknowledgment as evidence of a new debt and not as acknowledgment of an existing debt. It should be possible to plead successfully that the unstamped acknowledgment can save limitation for a period of 3 years and if it is a mortgage for a period of 12 years from the date of acknowledgment.

Read more
Answered on 3/20/09, 5:35 am
Sudershan Goel India Law Offices of Sudershan Goel - Advocate

Re: Law of limitation

The validity of loan documents is not affected by insufficiency or lack of stamps.

If a document is unstamped, it may still be valid and there may be a small penalty in lieu of stamp which may be paid in court; normally it is twenty times of the stamp value; thus if the document required a stamp of one rupees, you may have to pay twenty rupees as penalty.

Advice : The borrower is taking an untenable plea and the bank is safe.

Read more
Answered on 3/20/09, 7:22 am
Aniruddha Pawse Aniruddha.P.Pawse Advocates

Re: Law of limitation

No

Read more
Answered on 3/20/09, 9:28 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Banking Law questions and answers in India