Legal Question in Civil Rights Law in India

A person sold his inherited/ancestral land in 1930 at Rs 95/ to a muslim without giving him the original registered sale deed and died after some some years. A welll situated in front of the land, and water of it was being used by a Lord Shiva Temple belong to their ancester situated in front of the land since past several years. Four grand sons of the vendor never allowed the vendee to take possesion. Son of the vendor died long back. After 15 years, in 1945 all the four grandsons of the vendor sold the same property to a hindu called Ram with all the original documents. Ram got it mutated in the union board in 1945. The muslim who failed to take possesion also sold the same property to a hindu called Shyam whose house is adjacent to the land in question in 1950. But Shyam too failed to take possesion. Both the sale deeds of 1930 and 1950 belong to muslim and Shyam never been used anywhere. Both Ram and Shyam r dead. Now with the help of antisocial elements heirs of Shyam is trying to take possesion of the land. What heirs of Ram should do? Will adverse law of possesion apply for heirs of Ram? Heirs of Ram had a judgement in their favour under section 144 of CrPC in 1993 declaring their possesion fought with other persons who too was claiming the land..

Asked on 10/10/09, 3:21 pm

Seshadri Srinivasan www.lawconcern.com

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

The facts are too many and interlinked too. It is better that this query is put along with all relevant documents for a final opinion.

Answered on 10/11/09, 4:50 am

Sudershan Goel India Law Offices of Sudershan Goel - Advocate

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

I agree with the above opinin. better you may consult a local lawyer with your documents.

Answered on 10/17/09, 9:53 am

Keywords

Match Any Match All

Country

State

Area of Law