Legal Question in Civil Rights Law in India

In suit for specific performance agreement executed by the owner def.no.2 def.no.1 being POA executed agreement admits the agreement in WS of def.no.2 def no.1&3 have not filed WS def.3 is not party to the agreement in remanded judgment issue framed against def.1 whether agreement is binding upon def.3 plaintiff filed for depositing amount of sale and filed pursis for deletion of def no3 as agreement not signed by him.

There is no question of property is solely owned by def.no2.

Whether rejection for pursis for deletion f party is proper?

Whether rejection of application of depositing reaming sale amount in court is proper?

Whether review application is maintainable u/s 114 of CPC read with O-47(1) for setting aside the orders on pursis and application for leading evidence?


Asked on 8/19/09, 12:17 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys
KAMAL GROVER

Your question required proper detail and consideration and cannot be in free questions. plz pay for the query and send full details

Your further clarification is welcome at nominal fee at;

[email protected]

Advocate

M:09814110005

PB. & HRY. HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH (INDIA)

With Regards

Read more
Answered on 8/19/09, 12:23 pm
Sudershan Goel India Law Offices of Sudershan Goel - Advocate

Not intelligly written. In any case, since it is a pending court case, advice from the counsel conducting your case may be obtained.

Read more
Answered on 8/20/09, 11:45 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Civil Rights Law questions and answers in India