Legal Question in Constitutional Law in India
Supreme Court
Supreme Court in its order on 6/5/2009 up held removal of the President of State Consumer Forum by Madras High Court by deciding on Quo warranto petition.
The Supreme Court had commented in its Judgment that Chief Justice of Madras High Court had not performed the consultation process for appointment of the President. It also felt the Chief Justice action in these regards are very much short of what was expected of a person holding such responsible position.
As on date the Chief Justice in this context is elevated to the post of Supreme Court Judge. In view of the judgment of 6/5/2009, will such elevation will come in the scan by legal quarters. My interest in the ongoing case is that I suffered very badly by the Judgments of the deposed President in end of 2008
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Supreme Court
consult a SC practitioner.
Re: Supreme Court
You may better forget your sufferance and accept the final verdict. However, an effort may be made to challenge the judgement before the National Commission and / or the Supreme Court of India.
No action may be maintainable against the then CJ, now elevated as a Supreme Court Judge.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Definition of State under Article 12 Latest leading case deciding the various test... Asked 4/28/09, 3:52 am in India Constitutional Law
-
Legal entity Can a private limited company which gives loans and advances on... Asked 4/22/09, 1:32 pm in India Constitutional Law
-
Civil procedure code Can high-court appoint a commission ? Asked 4/19/09, 3:09 am in India Constitutional Law
-
Constitutional law how many fundamental rights are there? Asked 4/15/09, 6:32 am in India Constitutional Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
