Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
in acriminal casemain investigation officer is no more.the person assisted him came as a witness. in his cross he admitted that the accused a3 was not examined by him.he stated tht' it is true the witnessess statements recorded by me does not disclose any incriminating material against a3'. does it help a3.?majority of witnesses were examined by main investigating officer.important documents were not marked in his absence
3 Answers from Attorneys
it may depending on other corroborative evidence
there are other factors also that determine the case against an accused person., viz. witnesses, documents etc. no concrete opinion can be given in this forum as the lawyer cannot go through the f.i.r, charge sheet, evidence etc. better consult a lawyer in person.
At trial, I.O.'s scribe will be able to depose about contradictions/improvements/omissions.
You need to assess the case from the evidence of witnesses with aforesaid.
Related Questions & Answers
-
5-6 days ago my uncle went to his neighbor to have a talk on a land issue that has... Asked 1/09/12, 8:34 am in India Criminal Law
-
Can person get anticipatory bail for forgery and cheating Asked 1/09/12, 2:44 am in India Criminal Law
-
If a newly married women went from husbands house after 40 days of marriage with all... Asked 1/08/12, 6:58 am in India Criminal Law
-
After getting call from CAW cell, my family applied for Notice Bail but judge... Asked 1/08/12, 12:24 am in India Criminal Law
-
NIA 138 case was regd in UP & FIR was lodged u/s IPC 420 later 2 parties arrived... Asked 1/06/12, 11:16 pm in India Criminal Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
