Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
In my case of bail application, under section 27, drugs and cosmetic act, 1940( Uttar pradesh amendment), the chief judicial magistrate has said to confirm whether he has the jurisdiction to try the case or not. He has cited the case of Ravindra prakash V/S union of india( Allahabad High court) 1984 where the court held that only session court has the power to try the case since the pinishment under the case is more than 10 years. Therefore the C.J.M has said to check and get any other case which has overruled this judgement. Is there any citation which the courts follows and which has overruled this judgement making it very clear about the jurisdiction of the case.
Asked on 10/05/10, 2:44 am
1 Answer from Attorneys
RAJIV GUPTA
(Cell: +91 9811284735) [email protected]
you may file the case in sessions court.
Answered on 10/05/10, 9:28 am
Related Questions & Answers
-
My client had bounced three cheques of different dates before three months .now he... Asked 10/05/10, 2:06 am in India Criminal Law
-
Hi, I am victim of false 498a case. My wife has filed 498a against Me,Father,Mother... Asked 10/05/10, 1:27 am in India Criminal Law
-
Sir, One of my known person had taken a loan from me for Rs.2.5 Lakh against issuing... Asked 10/04/10, 10:46 pm in India Criminal Law
-
Can the recall of NBW's possible in the absence of accused in 138 N.I.Act .Any... Asked 10/04/10, 12:05 pm in India Criminal Law
-
In the case of drug and cosmetic act 1940, section 27, who has the jurisdiction to... Asked 10/04/10, 9:40 am in India Criminal Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
