Legal Question in Criminal Law in India

Case ragistered in delhi, act 420,406,34 IPC, person (A) take few cheques from a client with wrong commintment of Personal Loan, person (B) also commited to client for personal loan on his call (recording available) and one cheque amount-1.15000 deposited into (C) person account and cash it with using name and address of person (D) without giving any id proof to bank. Person D not residing at his address its his old address he left that house. Person D is inocent now he is residing in punjab in rented house. A, B & C already arrested & release by bail. Now (D) applied for Anti Cipetory Bail. What have to do?, how to poof his loyalty & he don't want mentally exerssion. What he have to do? Here the A,B & C just using name and address of (D) at the time of cash the cheque from (C) account.

In FIR D person name is not mentioned.

A, B & C impose the blame on D in there statements.

Is this right decision to apply for Anti cipetory in high court by person D.

How much chances of its clearance.


Asked on 5/20/11, 1:15 am

1 Answer from Attorneys
Vishwa Arya Arya & Co.

yes, it is an obvious decision. A B C will certainly try to shift the blame on D for their defence. In my opinion, D has a good chance of ABail. D seems to be under unnecessary panic.

Read more
Answered on 5/20/11, 1:21 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in India