Legal Question in Criminal Law in India

Case relating to 138 of N.I.Act

I want similar case relating to:

1.Income proof of complainant asked by accused is not required by any High Court or Supreme Court?

2. Is there any provision under this law the income of the complainant is to be shown ?

3. The amount is of 18 lakhs and the accused has taken by way of cheque and cash.


Asked on 9/22/08, 11:56 pm

4 Answers from Attorneys
Shrichand Nahar S.V.Nahar, Advocate

Re: Case relating to 138 of N.I.Act

Please search websites of Supreme Court and High Courts.

Read more
Answered on 9/23/08, 1:41 am
Aniruddha Pawse Aniruddha.P.Pawse Advocates

Re: Case relating to 138 of N.I.Act

Already Replied.

Read more
Answered on 9/23/08, 4:11 am
Sudershan Goel India Law Offices of Sudershan Goel - Advocate

Re: Case relating to 138 of N.I.Act

The complainanat has to prove only valid 'consideration' in lieu of the cheque issued by the accused. He does not have to prove his income which has no relevancy with the cheque issued by him.

Read more
Answered on 9/23/08, 7:52 am
Vijay Chandavale Advocate Vijay Chandavale & Associates

Re: Case relating to 138 of N.I.Act

i think u r unnecessarily bothering urself . If u establish that cheque was given for legally enforceable consideration your burden is no more to prove the case

Read more
Answered on 9/30/08, 10:36 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in India