Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
In a complaint u/s 138 N I Act, allegation of offence u/s 420 was also made, but trial court neither took cognizance u/s 420 IPC nor written any word about Offence u/s 420 IPC while taking cognizance of u/s 138 N I Act. So a revision was filed before session court, so revision/Session Court has remanded to trial court for looking again whether the offence has been made out u/s 420 IPC in addition to offence u/s 138 N I Act already taken. That the next hearing date in trial court is in February 2012. Now my querry is: Whether the complainant has to wait till February 2012 or whether the complainant can approach today itself for considering the order of session court, at trial court level.
3 Answers from Attorneys
the complainant has no option but to wait till February 2012 as the sessions court just ordered the judge to exercise his discretion once again.
Yes the complainant has to wait till feb 2012.
Courts have their usage and practices.Be guided by lawyers visiting that court regularly.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Hi, i had failed to attend the court in a few instances for a 138 case for some... Asked 8/26/11, 7:13 am in India Criminal Law
-
Hi, i had failed to attend the court in a few instances for a 138 case and have been... Asked 8/26/11, 7:07 am in India Criminal Law
-
I am in situation where i am facing NIA 138 on one hand and on the other the party... Asked 8/26/11, 1:58 am in India Criminal Law
-
A FIR for 498a, 406 has been filed in a state( lets say-Z) where the police has... Asked 8/25/11, 2:03 am in India Criminal Law