Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
compl.file case u/s 138niof twodiffrent chq. ,twodiff.a/c twodiff.persone,diff.date in one casewhich was given for securety purpose bounce due to stop payment by accus.but for one trancation of brokreg charge accus. difence is that they alredy paid amount to compl.but due to cverlook it left with compl.accus. alredy informed to compl. by Re.post AD to returned the same to accus.which recevied by complaint and nw compl misusing check with intension to grabe more money from accused advocate notice send by complnainant was mentioned wrong surname hence not claimed by accused. acusse is having evidence of letter send by them and also police complaint against complainant for abussing the acussed before filing cr.case even complainant outstanding amount supposed to be recoverable from accused in ITR. what will be your court view in this regard and is this case is mentainable u/sec138NI.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Triplicate. Answered before.
Court views will be clear at the end of trial while delivering judgment. There is no system of any advance ruling by the court.
Related Questions & Answers
-
I am complainant (as p/a holder for xyz) have filed complaint u/s 138 against... Asked 10/17/11, 7:36 am in India Criminal Law
-
Complainant ricived two chq. of tow diffrent a/c from two diffrent persons but... Asked 10/17/11, 12:52 am in India Criminal Law
-
Suppose A,a person is fighting with B & a3rd person comes in b/w &in... Asked 10/16/11, 11:19 pm in India Criminal Law
-
In a dispropotionate of Asset case the CBI submitted a charge sheet. One of the... Asked 10/16/11, 12:52 am in India Criminal Law
-
Respected Experts, I filed a mutual divorce in march but before the final hearing my... Asked 10/15/11, 11:57 pm in India Criminal Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
