Legal Question in Criminal Law in India

compl.file case u/s 138niof twodiffrent chq. ,twodiff.a/c twodiff.persone,diff.date in one casewhich was given for securety purpose bounce due to stop payment by accus.but for one trancation of brokreg charge accus. difence is that they alredy paid amount to compl.but due to cverlook it left with compl.accus. alredy informed to compl. by Re.post AD to returned the same to accus.which recevied by complaint and nw compl misusing check with intension to grabe more money from accused advocate notice send by complnainant was mentioned wrong surname hence not claimed by accused. acusse is having evidence of letter send by them and also police complaint against complainant for abussing the acussed before filing cr.case even complainant outstanding amount supposed to be recoverable from accused in ITR. what will be your court view in this regard and is this case is mentainable u/sec138NI.


Asked on 10/17/11, 11:01 am

3 Answers from Attorneys

Sudershan Goel India Law Offices of Sudershan Goel - Advocate

Duplicate. Answered before.

Read more
Answered on 10/17/11, 7:11 pm
Aniruddha Pawse Aniruddha.P.Pawse Advocates

you can defend yourself with the proofs.

Read more
Answered on 10/20/11, 6:38 am
Shrichand Nahar S.V.Nahar, Advocate

Same/similar query replied just now. See that reply.

Read more
Answered on 10/29/11, 11:08 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in India