Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
there is a criminal case against A. witness pw 5 in his 161 says that A told him about the crime alleged to have committed by A over phone. pw 5 says he has not told about this to pw6. but pw6 says pw5 told him about that. but now pw5 is no more . the trial is yet to start what is the value of pw6 evidence pw6 knows only what pw 5alleged to have said to him ( consider what pw5 alleged to have said to pw6 is in the normal course of business)
Asked on 11/08/09, 3:22 am
3 Answers from Attorneys
Seshadri Srinivasan
www.lawconcern.com
It may be hearsay evidence or it could be admissable as evidence due to a special provision of law also.
Depends entirely on the Court!
Answered on 11/08/09, 6:29 am
RAJIV GUPTA
(Cell: +91 9811284735) [email protected]
it may be considered as a hearsay and out of the purview of evidence.
Answered on 11/08/09, 11:40 am
Related Questions & Answers
-
I have ask a question before. but two lawyer say two opposite thing. i want to be... Asked 11/06/09, 1:18 pm in India Criminal Law
-
We have a Interim Stay of Arrest for 3 months(Ther eis no stay on Investigation).... Asked 11/06/09, 1:14 am in India Criminal Law
-
I read in a recent judgement that effect of fraud should be considered. what does it... Asked 11/05/09, 8:20 am in India Criminal Law
-
As rules are not adhered by both parties the auction is considered to be non... Asked 11/05/09, 8:04 am in India Criminal Law