Legal Question in Criminal Law in India

About the Criminal Jurisprudence

Due to a rivalary between me and somebody I got falsely implicated in a not so major crime in India.Due to my stupidity OR careless nature,I decided to defend myself without a lawyer and got convicted for the crime in the court.I appealed in the higher court on the same day but in my appeal I failed to say that the evidence which has been admitted by the trial court should not be admitted as it is a hearsay OR nonadmissible evidence.As it is not possible for me to hire an advocate at the moment,I thought that I would take somebodies opinion on internet.Do you think that I can push this point before the current court that the evidence should not be admitted,though my appeal does not talk about this issue?

I do have another query.In the trial's court judgement,the court has come to some conclusions which are contrary even to the testimonies of the prosecution. I think when the witness accepts certain things,the court has no right to disbelieve him.By doing so the court has commited a greatest human blunder.Is it possible for me to prosecute a judge for such an act though he enjoyes an immunity?


Asked on 6/03/01, 3:21 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys
Satish Maheshwari Vakilbabu

Re: About the Criminal Jurisprudence

Dear Friend,

I am sorry, but as a matter of practise, we do not reply to queries from the persons, who do not give their complete details, nor to the persons not directly affected by the problem under the query. We also do not give any citations to the seekers.

Therefore we request you to send your query only through the query form at the Free legal advice pages of the vakilbabu website at http://www.vakilbabu.com quoting the reference LawGuru.com.

We believe you shall understand.

Warm regards

Satish Maheshwari.

Read more
Answered on 7/08/01, 4:24 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in India